Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cureus ; 15(5): e39661, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37398755

RESUMO

Bouveret syndrome is ectopic gallstone impaction and obstruction of the duodenum or pylorus affecting a small minority of gallstone ileus cases. There have been advances in its endoscopic management, but this remains a challenging condition to treat successfully. We present a patient with Bouveret syndrome who required open surgical extraction and gastrojejunostomy after attempts of endoscopic retrieval and electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL). A 79-year-old man with a medical history of gastroesophageal reflux disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on 5 liters of oxygen at baseline, and coronary artery disease with recent stenting presented to the hospital with three days of abdominal pain and vomiting. CT of the abdomen/pelvis demonstrated gastric outlet obstruction, a 4.5 cm gallstone in the proximal duodenum, cholecystoduodenal fistula, gallbladder wall thickening, and pneumobilia. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) demonstrated a black pigmented stone impacted in the duodenal bulb with ulceration of the inferior wall. Repeated Roth net retrieval attempts of the stone were unsuccessful even after biopsy forceps were used to trim the stone's margins. The next day, EGD with EHL used 20 shocks of 200 watts, allowing for partial stone removal and fragmentation, but the majority of the stone remained stuck to the wall. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted but was converted to an open extraction of the gallstone from the duodenum, pyloric exclusion, and gastrojejunostomy. The gallbladder remained in place, and the cholecystoduodenal fistula was not surgically repaired. The patient experienced significant postoperative pulmonary insufficiency and remained on the ventilator with failure of multiple spontaneous breathing trials. Postoperative imaging showed resolution of pneumobilia but a small amount of contrast leaked from the duodenum revealing the fistula's persistence. After 14 days of unsuccessful ventilator weaning, the family opted for palliative extubation. Advanced endoscopic techniques have been regarded as the first-line intervention for Bouveret syndrome as there is low morbidity and mortality associated with them. However, there is a reduced success rate compared to surgical intervention. Open surgical management has high morbidity and mortality in the elderly and comorbid patients commonly affected by this condition. Thus, the risks and benefits must be weighed and individualized for each patient with Bouveret syndrome before therapeutic intervention.

2.
Clin Sarcoma Res ; 10: 11, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32670544

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare and heterogeneous tumors making chemotherapy use controversial. Our goal was to identify a subset of patients with primary STS that benefit with the addition of chemotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review included intermediate to high-grade localized primary STS of the extremity/trunk, and tumor size > 5 cm. The effect of chemotherapy was evaluated for local control (LC), distant control (DC), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In this cohort (n = 273), patients were treated with surgery (98%), radiation (81%), and chemotherapy (24.5%). With a median follow-up of 51 months, the entire cohort's 5-year LC, DC, PFS, and OS are 79.1%, 59.9%, 43.8%, and 68.7%, respectively. The addition of chemotherapy did not provide a DC benefit (p = 0.238) for the entire cohort. High-grade disease (n = 210) experienced a 5-year benefit in DC (68% vs. 54.4%, p = 0.04), which was more pronounced with MAI (Mesna, Adriamycin, Ifosfamide) based regimens (74.2%, p = 0.016), and a 5-year PFS (50.8% vs 45%, p = 0.025) and OS benefit (76.2% vs 70%, p = 0.067) vs. no chemotherapy. On multivariate analysis of the high-grade subset, chemotherapy independently predicted for a DC benefit (HR 0.48 95% CI 0.26-89, p = 0.019). The benefit of chemotherapy was more pronounced with MAI, showing a significant benefit in DC (HR 0.333 95% CI 0.145-0.767, p = 0.01) and PFS (HR 0.52 95% CI 0.28-0.99, p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: In patients with localized STS > 5 cm, the high-grade subset had a distant control benefit with the addition of chemotherapy, leading to improved progression free survival. This is more pronounced with the use of MAI and should be considered in patients eligible for this regimen.

3.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 24(5): 991-999, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31147973

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recurrent/persistent symptoms of achalasia occur in 10-20% of individuals after Heller myotomy. The causes and treatment outcomes are ambiguous. Our aim is to assess the causes and outcomes of a multidisciplinary approach to this patient population. METHODS: All patients undergoing revisional operations after a Heller myotomy were reviewed retrospectively. DATA COLLECTED: demographics, date of initial Heller myotomy, preoperative evaluation, etiology of recurrent symptoms, date of revisional operation, and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients underwent 37 revisional operations. Operations were tailored based on preoperative multidisciplinary evaluation. Causes of symptoms: periesophageal/perihiatal fibrosis 11 (27%), obstructing fundoplication 11 (27%), incomplete myotomy 8 (20%), progression of disease 9 (22%), and epiphrenic diverticulum 1 (2%). Operations performed: reversal/no creation of fundoplication with or without re-do myotomy 22 (59%), revision/creation of fundoplication with or without myotomy 6 (16%), and esophagectomy 9 (24%). Ten patients in the 37 operations (27%) developed postoperative complications. Of 33 patients for 36 operations with follow-up, 25 patient-operations (69%) resulted in resolution or improved dysphagia. Although there was variation in symptomatic improvement by cause and operation type, none reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: There are several causes of dysphagia after Heller myotomy and a thoughtful evaluation is required. Complication rates are higher than first-time operations. Symptomatic improvement occurs in the majority of cases, but a significant minority will have persistent dysphagia. Although an individualized approach to dysphagia after Heller myotomy may improve symptoms and passage of food, the perception of dysphagia may persist in patients.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Deglutição , Acalasia Esofágica , Miotomia de Heller , Laparoscopia , Transtornos de Deglutição/etiologia , Transtornos de Deglutição/cirurgia , Acalasia Esofágica/cirurgia , Fundoplicatura , Miotomia de Heller/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...